[BUG] multivariable chain rule

Tevian Dray tevian at math.oregonstate.edu
Tue Nov 15 17:23:06 PST 2005


>> One problem with insisting  dp = (grad p) dot (d rvec) is that this
>> assumes there is an inner product present.

>> dp makes sense even if there is no inner product on the (u,v):
>> dp=p_u du+p_v dv.

Good point!  You are absolutely right, and in fact the gradient itself makes
no sense unless there is an inner product.  So let me rephrase my earlier
comments: The "Master Formula" (your first equation above) is good if you want
to talk about the gradient, including directional derivatives (and related
applications involving, say, velocities), but straight differentials (your
second equation) are best if you instead want to discuss the chain rule.

And I like your description in terms of "place-holders".  I sometimes talk
about differentials as "numerators of derivatives", a similar point of view.

Tevian



More information about the BUG mailing list